| blade-finance-README.md | Repository overview, specifications, pipeline description, and usage | May 2026 |
| blade-finance-simulation.html | Interactive governance simulator · 8-stage AUTHREX pipeline · 6 scenarios + Monte Carlo (financial-sector governance) | May 2026 |
| blade-finance-paper.pdf | Research paper (17 pp): architecture, equations, simulation results, limitations, references | May 2026 |
| blade-finance-CONFIG.json | Node configuration: plane definitions, component metadata, provenance | May 2026 |
| blade-finance-ELECTRICAL.json | Electrical connection map: 33 power and data links across the four planes | May 2026 |
| blade-finance-MECHANICAL.json | Mechanical attachment map: 32 enclosure mounts, thermal interfaces, connectors | May 2026 |
| blade-finance-PARTS.csv | Reference bill of materials: 36 components, 91 units, approximately $9,228 (CSV) | May 2026 |
| guide-blade-finance-simulation.pdf | Simulation user and reproducibility guide | May 2026 |
| blade-finance-schematic.svg | System schematic (vector wiring view) | May 2026 |
| blade-finance-schematic.pdf | System schematic (print-ready PDF) | May 2026 |
| blade-finance-metadata.json | Zenodo deposit metadata (authors, keywords, related identifiers) | May 2026 |
| LICENSE | CC BY 4.0 | May 2026 |
BLADE-FINANCE Governance Node
Boundary-Layer Authority for Decision Enforcement, Financial-Sector Node - Reference Design and Simulation
A simulation-validated, software-enforced authority-arbitration reference architecture for financial-sector AI decision systems. BLADE-FINANCE places a hardware-anchored governance layer between automated transaction-decision models and consequential financial actions. It computes a four-tier authority disposition and appends every decision to a SHA-256 canonical-form evidence chain. It implements the eight-stage AUTHREX pipeline (VALIDATE, SATA, ADARA, MAIVA, HMAA, FLAME, ERAM, CARA) with a four-tier HMAA model (T3/T2/T1/T0), a population-state coordination model across account, device, payee, and IP-cluster history, and a retrospective stigmergic swarm-review module that recovers coordinated low-and-slow rings the per-transaction path clears. Tenth platform in the BLADE family and the first in the economic-security domain.
This is a reference design and simulation (TRL 3-4 simulation / TRL 2 hardware). No prototype has been built. All data are synthetic. The reported recall is an actionable-risk triage measure, not an empirical fraud-detection rate. The retrospective swarm review claims ensemble agreement and ring detection, not Byzantine fault tolerance. Per-record ECDSA P-256 signing and HSM key custody are design-specified, not exercised in the browser. The work has not been deployed in any financial institution. No federal endorsement is claimed.
Publication
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20374692
Author: Burak Oktenli · AUTHREX Systems; Georgetown University, M.P.S. Applied Intelligence
ORCID: 0009-0001-8573-1667
License: CC BY 4.0 · Version: v1.0 · May 2026
Policy and Standards Drivers
- U.S. Treasury Financial Services AI Risk Management Framework (FS AI RMF) - implementation framing for govern, map, measure, and manage functions applied at transaction-decision time.
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 - foundation for the authority-tiering and evidence requirements.
- Executive Order 14179 - cited as implementation-framing policy context, not as endorsement.
Key Specifications
- Governance Plane: Xilinx Kria K26 SOM, hosting the AUTHREX pipeline and emitting ECDSA-signed per-stage audit entries
- Inference Plane: NVIDIA L4 Tensor Core GPU, hosting the transaction-decision model on a plane separate from governance
- Host Security Plane: Intel Xeon-D 1747NTE with Infineon SLB 9670 TPM 2.0 for measured boot
- Key Custody: YubiHSM 2 within a FIPS 140-2 Level 3 tamper-evident enclosure (epoxy potting, screw-continuity zeroization)
- Network: dual Intel X710-DA2 10GbE SFP+ for transactions; isolated 1GbE for management
- Enclosure: 1U rack-mount (19 inch EIA-310), redundant 600W 80-Plus Platinum PSUs, six 40mm N+1 fans
- Reference BOM: 36 components, 91 units, approximately $9,228
Eight-Stage AUTHREX Pipeline (Financial Instantiation)
- VALIDATE: Schema and canonical-form validation of the transaction record; malformed input rejected before scoring
- SATA: Input-integrity and authentication-trust scoring across channels; low-trust inputs excluded from the decision
- ADARA: Adversarial and deepfake / synthetic-identity signal assessment
- MAIVA: Multi-signal agreement aggregation across model, rules, and population-state evidence
- HMAA: Authority-tier arbitration (T3/T2/T1/T0) from upstream outputs and the population-state coordination score
- FLAME: Latency-bounded scheduling; fails closed to a more restrictive tier on budget exhaustion
- ERAM: Residual-risk gating before final disposition
- CARA: Recovery and manual-hold path; emits corrective audit entries
A retrospective stigmergic swarm-review module runs off the decision path, re-examining cleared traffic to recover coordinated rings that stay under per-transaction thresholds.
SHA-256 Evidence Chain
- Every stage output and final disposition serialized in canonical form and appended to a hash-chained, append-only audit ledger
- Per-record ECDSA P-256 signing and HSM key custody are design-specified at the hardware layer (not exercised in the browser simulator)
- Tamper-evidence is verifiable: a fixed seed reproduces a fixed ledger head hash and running checksum
Validation Scenarios (Simulator)
- A Nominal transaction - baseline legitimate activity - autonomous clearance
- B Deepfake authentication attack - synthetic-identity / liveness spoof pressure on VALIDATE and SATA
- C AI-agent coordinated attack - automated multi-account pressure on ADARA and MAIVA
- D High-value / risk signals - elevated-amount transactions exercising HMAA tier escalation
- MIX Realistic mixed stream - blended legitimate and adversarial traffic
- E Low-and-slow ring - coordinated ring the per-transaction path clears, recovered by the retrospective Swarm Review module
The engine is deterministic (mulberry32). Stepping the deterministic stream to 1,000 records at seed 42 fixes the audit-ledger head hash to 7d5aaab4... and the running checksum to 0x06acd6be. Triage confidence intervals are Wilson score intervals over a 2,000-trial run. The self-test suite reports nine of nine passing.
Standards Alignment
- U.S. Treasury Financial Services AI Risk Management Framework (FS AI RMF)
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0
- Executive Order 14179 (implementation-framing policy context)
- SHA-256 canonical-form serialization for the tamper-evident evidence chain
Related Work
- SATA:
10.5281/zenodo.18936251 - HMAA:
10.5281/zenodo.18861653 - CARA:
10.5281/zenodo.18917790 - ADARA:
10.5281/zenodo.19043924 - MAIVA:
10.5281/zenodo.19015517 - FLAME:
10.5281/zenodo.19015618 - BLADE-EDGE (defense):
10.5281/zenodo.19177472 - BLADE-AV (automotive):
10.5281/zenodo.19232130 - BLADE-MARITIME (maritime):
10.5281/zenodo.19246785 - BLADE-INFRA (critical infrastructure):
10.5281/zenodo.19277887 - BLADE-SPACE (orbital):
10.5281/zenodo.20183269 - BLADE-CUAS (counter-UAS):
10.5281/zenodo.20299604 - BLADE-AGENT-HSM (agentic AI):
10.5281/zenodo.20299821 - BLADE-SWARM (swarm autonomy):
10.5281/zenodo.20351198 - BLADE-INFRA-OT (IT/OT bridge):
10.5281/zenodo.20342067
Author
Burak Oktenli
AUTHREX Systems · Georgetown University, M.P.S. Applied Intelligence
ORCID: 0009-0001-8573-1667
Website: burakoktenli.com